Salma Loudili vs Olivia Bergler Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 May at 01:28 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Loudili vs O. Bergler

MAR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

POL
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Loudili 1 - 0 Bergler
They have played 3 sets in total, with Salma Loudili winning 2 and Olivia Bergler winning 1. The last match between Salma Loudili and Olivia Bergler was at the W35 Orlando, 20-05-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 2-6 7-6(6) 10-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Loudili | 1 |
| Bergler | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W35 Orlando(05-20-25)
S. Loudili vs O. Bergler H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 35.00% (7-13) | Career Total W/L | 48.81% (41-43) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Loudili vs O. Bergler Match Preview:
- In recent months, Bergler has significantly outperformed Loudili on second serves, winning 35.9% of points compared to Loudili's 0%.
- How effective is each player in returning their opponent's serve? Bergler has been more successful, winning 56.96% and 30.04% on opponents' second and first serve returns respectively, while Loudili again registers 0%.
- Under pressure, Bergler has saved 46.94% of breakpoints, unlike Loudili, who has not saved any. Could handling breakpoints be Bergler's advantage?
- In the past year, Bergler has a match win rate of 41.18% compared to Loudili's 50%, though Loudili's lower match count could influence this percentage.
- Considering surface preferences, Bergler shows the best performance on Hard courts with a 52% win rate, whereas Loudili excels on Clay with 33%.
- Both players have been competing at different levels: Bergler at Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K with a 39.13% win rate, and Loudili at Challengers/ITF > $10K with 50%.
- When it comes to opponent quality, Bergler’s opponents had an average rank of 270.53 while Loudili faced opponents with no significant recorded rank.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Loudili has a slight edge with a 50% win rate in these scenarios, compared to Bergler's 44%.
- How proficient are the players at converting breakpoints lately? Bergler converts 44.83% of opportunities, unlike Loudili, who has not converted any in recent form.
Editorial Prediction (May 21, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match presents an interesting contrast in playing styles and recent performances.
Bergler showcases a solid edge with proficiency in second serve performance and returns, both critical in tilting match outcomes in their favor. The ability to save breakpoints further enhances Bergler's chances, especially when under pressure.
Loudili, although holding a better win percentage over the past year, reflects a vulnerability with zero returns on critical serve performance stats. However, their strong performance in deciding sets suggests they can pose a challenge if the match goes the distance.
Evaluating career match statistics and current form metrics as a whole, the calculated advantage lies with Bergler to emerge victorious in this matchup.
Salma Loudili vs Olivia Bergler Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Loudili vs O. Bergler H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 15 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:23:8 | Average Match Time | 2:23:8 |
| 72% (55/76) | 1st Serve % | 79% (65/82) |
| 36% (20/55) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (31/65) |
| 57% (12/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (6/17) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 64% (7/11) |
| 55% (45/82) | Return Points Win % | 58% (44/76) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Loudili Recent Matches Played
O. Bergler Recent Matches Played

S. Loudili vs O. Bergler Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35.00% (7/13) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.81% (41/43) |
| 35.42% (17/31) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.94% (92/96) |
| 42.02% (187/258) | Games Win/Loss | 49.18% (814/841) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.13% (17/15) |
| 40.00% (6/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 47.06% (24/27) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 4 | Aces Total | 48 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 27 | Total Double Faults | 232 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:24:59 |
| 206.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 290.08 |
| 67% (469/695) | 1st Serve % | 65% (2822/4334) |
| 47% (220/469) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (1573/2822) |
| 42% (94/226) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (640/1512) |
| 46% (37/80) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (257/541) |
| 44% (310/698) | Return Points Win % | 46% (1870/4064) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Challenger W/L | 44.83% (13/16) |
| 23.08% (3/10) | Futures W/L | 50.91% (28/27) |
| 35% (7/20) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (41/84) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (8/12) |
| 63% (5/8) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (10/20) |
| 50% (4/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (41/34) |
| 50% (4/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (41/7) |
| 31% (16/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (43/7) |